LexVisual is the one workspace where lean legal, compliance, and product teams capture obligations in context, assign ownership, track progress, and produce the evidence to show it was done.
This is the gap we kept seeing in practice. The obligations were known — but nobody had made them operational inside the business. Nobody owned them. Nothing was tracked.
Lean teams have it worse. They face exactly the same regulatory surface as a large enterprise, without the GRC infrastructure, the implementation project, or a dedicated team. LexVisual was designed for that reality.
Most compliance gaps are not failures of intention. They are the result of a regulatory landscape that is genuinely hard to navigate — overlapping frameworks, obligations that reference other laws, requirements that accumulate quietly as a business grows.
Four questions. We map your top risk areas and where to start.
A starting point, not legal advice.
The DMA creates a new tier of obligations for designated gatekeepers — but its reach extends to any organisation that integrates with, builds on top of, or distributes through those platforms. Understanding which obligations apply to you is not always obvious.
You must provide a privacy notice at the time of collection, covering the identity of the controller, the purposes and legal basis for processing, how long data will be retained, and the rights of the individual.
For gatekeepers specifically, the Commission has also clarified the relationship between DMA obligations and the GDPR consent framework — particularly where data flows across services.
Gatekeepers must not combine personal data from the core platform service with data from any other service or third-party source without obtaining separate, valid GDPR consent. Users who do not consent must still be offered access to the service on equivalent terms.
Enforcement action is already underway. The Commission has opened non-compliance proceedings against several designated gatekeepers over exactly this provision.
LexVisual was built by people who have sat on both sides of the problem. One founder has spent years working in regulatory compliance intelligence — reviewing obligations, advising legal and product teams, writing frameworks across multiple jurisdictions. The insight that drove the product was not a market analysis. It was watching the same failure repeat: obligations understood but never operationalised. Nobody owned them. Nothing was tracked.
The technical architecture reflects years of applied ML research, with work published at ICLR, NeurIPS, and ICML. The result is a verified library that is not a scrape, a dashboard that is not a spreadsheet in disguise, and an AI layer that is honest about what it knows and what it does not.
Not another compliance database. Not another enterprise GRC suite. A workspace built for lean teams who need to move fast, stay rigorous, and have something to show for it.